0203 026 3870
Newsom Consulting
Delivering Leadership Talent
Newsom ConsultingNewsom Consulting
  • Sectors
    • Rail
    • Aviation
    • Highways
    • Power & Utilities
    • Buildings
    • Defence
    • Major Projects
    • Transport Operators
    • International
  • Our Services
    • Executive Search
    • Talent Mapping
    • Leadership Assessment
    • Outplacement
  • Opportunities
  • Testimonials
  • Insights
    • Blogs
    • Reports & Guides
  • About Us
    • Our Team
    • Diversity & Inclusion
  • Contact Us
  • Sectors
    • Rail
    • Aviation
    • Highways
    • Power & Utilities
    • Buildings
    • Defence
    • Major Projects
    • Transport Operators
    • International
  • Our Services
    • Executive Search
    • Talent Mapping
    • Leadership Assessment
    • Outplacement
  • Opportunities
  • Testimonials
  • Insights
    • Blogs
    • Reports & Guides
  • About Us
    • Our Team
    • Diversity & Inclusion
  • Contact Us

Construction companies – Does the Plc model work?

It seems that rarely a day goes by where the construction industry isn’t making headlines recently.

Since Carillion’s infamous fall from the top, fears for the security of the remaining construction giants are mounting, and people are keeping a close watch on how they will deal with the fallout.

It was announced last month that Interserve is under close scrutiny from the government amid profit warnings, Galliford Try last week shocked shareholders by asking for a £150m fundraise (knocking the share price down by 18.2%) and Skanska launched a massive restructuring that will cost 3,000 jobs as the group broadcast the details of its own financial woes. And this is just to name a few.

One thing all these struggling companies have in common – they are all publicly traded companies.

This is not to say that privately owned limited companies are not facing the same tough times as the rest of the market. Far from it. Just this week Lagan Construction Group sent four of its arms into administration and Laing O’Rourke have delayed the filing of their 2017 accounts, raising concerns.

The difference is that the Limited companies don’t have the added pressure of a panel of shareholders eagerly waiting to find out the dividend they will be taking home or what the share price is trading at today. Reporting the big losses that are all now coming out of the woodwork means somebody’s head is on the line.

As a result, this culture of “aggressive accounting” as the House of Commons so tactfully put it, has been allowed to foster in some contractors.

In a lot of industries, the strict financial reporting and auditing plc’s are subjected to would highlight critical financial issues sooner rather than later. But in the construction world, with major projects lasting 4+ years, there is a certain level of flexibility as to what is reported and when.

It can be very tempting to recognise a nice chunky profit at the start of a scheme as opposed to when it is actually certain. Similarly, why report that unexpected loss in the first year of a project? Surely things will turn around before completion, right?

But in the long run, this flexibility isn’t giving an accurate picture of the company’s health, which is why between 2012 and 2016 Carillion paid out £376m in dividends, yet its cash from operations was just £159m*.

In contrast, for Limited companies, they don’t need to make announcements to the stock market and there is little incentive for them to hide losses allowing them to deal with the issues as they arise – hopefully before things get out of hand.

Financial motivations aside, people are looking at these big Plc’s in a new light, and from a candidate perspective, there are certainly some downsides (and upsides) to working at a plc as opposed to a private company.

What are the main differences from a candidate perspective?

 

1. Short term vs Long term views

Publicly traded companies have access to significantly more capital than their private counter parts, and this will attract candidates looking for access to the big, prestigious major projects. However, with the big financial input comes short term targets, and many plc’s will focus on the immediate share price impact of a decision rather than the long-term. Ltd’s tend to have a longer term outlook and as a result slightly less turnover in their executive teams.

 

 2. Management style

The focus on share price and financial reporting often results in more CEOs and MDs from accounting backgrounds at plc contractors. This creates a distinct culture within organisations which when combined with the frequent structural changes in acquiring and divesting different arms of their business, isn’t for everyone.

Limited companies are usually run by CEOs from an operational background and tend to benefit from more of a family feel, with shareholder’s objectives very closely aligned with the goals of the business.

 

 3. Decision making

Large plc’s often come with the drawback of added bureaucracy. This can make decision making a lengthy and drawn out process which can restrict entrepreneurial instincts.

 

4. Prestige

Whether deserved or not, having ‘Plc’ at the end of a company name can add standing and prestige. There is a sense of status about a plc that its private company counterpart just doesn’t quite have – particularly when the added capital means that plc’s have a significant advantage when competing for major projects.

 

Whether a plc or an Ltd, the construction sector is having to face some major challenges. But it’s not all doom and gloom, the shake up across the industry is also providing businesses the opportunity to review their current models and make changes, if you are looking to make any changes to your senior teams, get in touch HERE to see how we can help.

 

 

* http://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/CBP-8206

By Jim Newsom26th February 2018

Author: Jim Newsom

Jim Newsom leads our work in construction and infrastructure having worked in executive search since 1998, recruiting for both public and private sector companies in infrastructure, transport, engineering and construction. Prior to forming Newsom Consulting, Jim spent 11 years working for the one of the UK’s largest independently owned executive recruiters and then two years at a boutique search firm. Jim is a graduate in civil engineering from Liverpool University.

Post navigation

PreviousPrevious post:The changing face of the Train Operating marketNextNext post:Movers and Shakers in transport and infrastructure – the headlines from February 2018

Related posts

Movers and Shakers in Transport & Infrastructure – The Headlines from December 2021
7th January 2022
Movers and Shakers in Transport & Infrastructure – The Headlines from October 2021
1st November 2021
Movers and Shakers in Transport & Infrastructure – The Headlines from September 2021
11th October 2021
Movers and Shakers in Transport & Infrastructure – The Headlines from August 2021
6th September 2021
Movers and Shakers in Transport & Infrastructure – The Headlines from July 2021
5th August 2021
Movers and Shakers in Transport & Infrastructure – The Headlines from June 2021
7th July 2021

To recieve our weekly blogs please fill in your details below:

Recent Posts
  • UK Major Projects Pipeline Update – May 2022
    17th May 2022
  • 3 lessons learnt from Crossrail for future Major Projects
    9th May 2022
  • Movers and Shakers in Transport & Infrastructure – The Headlines from April 2022
    3rd May 2022
Testimonials

Since taking over as the CEO of Crossrail I have put a lot of effort into establishing the right leadership team to complete the project. Newsom Consulting have been a great partner in this work. Together we have worked to assemble a great new team  with the right energy and capability for one of the worlds most complex projects.

Jim and team are a real pleasure to work with; responsive and sensitive to our unique circumstances.

CEO, Crossrail

UK Power Network Services recently partnered with Newsom Consulting to recruit a key strategic appointment. They provided us with a targeted candidate search and shortlist of candidates from which we were able to make a successful appointment. Throughout the engagement there was senior involvement from Newsom Consulting and they demonstrated deep knowledge of the sector and market. They were patient, thorough and professional throughout the search.

 

Ian Smyth, Director of UK Power Networks Services

Thanks for supporting us in securing some of our industry’s leading talent. Your candidates are always excellent and I find you a pleasure to work with. Looking forward to furthering our partnership in the new year.

Managing Director (Transportation), Faithful+Gould
Newsom Consulting
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
Footer Menu

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

You can find out more about which cookies we are using or switch them off in settings.

Newsom Consulting
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.